<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surely the definition of overwrought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/</link>
	<description>Politics shaken, not stirred</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:18:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wigderson kills people and laughs about it : Wigderson Library &#38; Pub</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Wigderson kills people and laughs about it : Wigderson Library &#38; Pub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>[...] friend Mike Mathias leaps to the defense of the under-medicated Chris Liebenthal.  Well, Mike doesn&#8217;t exactly &#8220;leap.&#8221;  More like hops.  But anyway, he comes to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend Mike Mathias leaps to the defense of the under-medicated Chris Liebenthal.  Well, Mike doesn&#8217;t exactly &#8220;leap.&#8221;  More like hops.  But anyway, he comes to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wigderson</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wigderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I think Freddie would have voted for Scott Brown.  Did you see the layout in Cosmo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Freddie would have voted for Scott Brown.  Did you see the layout in Cosmo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>John Foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>Who Would Freddie Vote For?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who Would Freddie Vote For?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Pelican Pants</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Pelican Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m just happy that you guys are willing to settle for that 41-59 minority.&quot;

I&#039;m just happy that you guys are unable to advance anything with 59-41 majority.  If I recall, Bush had a much smaller Senate Majority, and pretty much did whatever he felt was best for the nation.  

Too bad you don&#039;t have a President like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m just happy that you guys are willing to settle for that 41-59 minority.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just happy that you guys are unable to advance anything with 59-41 majority.  If I recall, Bush had a much smaller Senate Majority, and pretty much did whatever he felt was best for the nation.  </p>
<p>Too bad you don&#8217;t have a President like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wigderson</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wigderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s 41-57-2.  And the 41 is about to get bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s 41-57-2.  And the 41 is about to get bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumps</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>grumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just happy that you guys are willing to settle for that 41-59 minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just happy that you guys are willing to settle for that 41-59 minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Hackbarth</title>
		<link>http://www.wigderson.com/index.php/2010/01/20/surely-the-definition-of-overwrought/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Hackbarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wigderson.com/?p=9700#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pro-gin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pro-gin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
